Three ways to turn science into practice to reduce HIV among key populations

Written by Rose Wilcher, Director, Research Utilization, FHI 360, and Hally Mahler, Project Director, LINKAGES

This blog post was originally featured on FHI 360’s Degrees.


blog-linkages-800X533

Photo: Jessica Scranton, FHI 360

Next week, leading scientists and cutting-edge thinkers will gather at the International AIDS Society’s 9th IAS Conference on HIV Science in Paris to discuss the latest scientific discoveries in HIV prevention, care and treatment. These discoveries hold the potential to accelerate progress toward the global 90-90-90 targets set forth by the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS). And, they are especially important for key populations — including men who have sex with men, sex workers, transgender people and people who inject drugs — who shoulder a disproportionate burden of HIV. UNAIDS estimates that 45% percent of all new HIV infections among adults worldwide occur among these key populations and their sex partners. Reaching these groups with new technologies and approaches is essential to ending the epidemic.

The headway on display at IAS will, we hope, leave us feeling optimistic. However, science cannot have impact unless it is applied in policy and programs. We are working to translate evidence of what works into widespread practice for key populations through the Linkages across the Continuum of HIV Services for Key Populations Affected by HIV (LINKAGES) project, which is funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and the U.S. President’s Emergency Fund for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR). But progress is slower than it should be, largely because the issues that drive the spread of HIV in key population communities — unrelenting stigma, discrimination, violence and, in many cases, criminalization — also mean that these groups are often the last to benefit from scientific discoveries.

To ensure that new technologies and emerging evidence-based practices reach those who want and need them most, we should do three things.

We need more community-led demand for the latest evidence-based innovations. Even the most compelling evidence does not put itself into practice, especially for the benefit of the most marginalized. When members of key populations demand access to innovations that could make a difference in their lives, that is often the needed catalyst to move research to practice. Organizations led by key populations are chronically underfunded and undervalued, but their voice and engagement are critical to ensuring that evidence-based practices reach them in a way that is safe, appropriate and responsive to their needs.

For example, great strides have been made in recent years using pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) as a new HIV prevention option, and it is sure to be a hot topic at the IAS conference. But, PrEP implementation, particularly for key populations, is complex and moving slowly. The International Treatment Preparedness Coalition (ITPC), a LINKAGES partner, recently convened a global think tank meeting with stakeholders representing the communities that are most affected by HIV to discuss how best to increase access to PrEP. “This was the first time that people from different communities from across the globe sat together in one room to discuss how to demand PrEP on their own terms,” said Solange Baptiste, executive director of ITPC. The discussions at that meeting are informing an upcoming global policy brief and an activist toolkit on PrEP that can accelerate implementation.

We must create an environment that enables the delivery and uptake of evidence-based interventions among those who need them most. Even when the latest prevention, care and treatment options and services are available, stigma, violence and discrimination from health care providers, family members, police, and partners hinder access to services. In many of the countries where LINKAGES works, including Botswana, Cameroon, the Dominican Republic, Kenya, Malawi and Suriname, we are systematically integrating violence prevention and response into HIV programming for key populations. We are working to mitigate stigma in health care facilities through the introduction of a text-message-based quality assurance tool that gathers information about key populations’ experiences of stigma and discrimination at health facilities and assesses overall client satisfaction with the care they received.

But, work to dismantle stigma and address violence against key populations, including through policy and legal reforms, always needs more attention. We will miss opportunities for the science to have maximum impact if the environment in which the science needs to be applied is not also progressing.

We need to accompany these efforts with the generation of more evidence through implementation science. Such investments will build collective knowledge about how to introduce proven interventions in real-world contexts, thereby speeding up the pace of replication and implementation at scale.

At the IAS conference, LINKAGES and colleagues from USAID, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and amfAR will convene a satellite session that will present findings from implementation science studies focused on key populations that were conducted in Brazil, Peru, Senegal, South Africa and Thailand. Taken together, these studies contribute important new evidence about how to enhance uptake of and retention in services for key populations, across the HIV prevention, care and treatment cascade. They also illustrate how valuable implementation science is to ensuring that proven interventions achieve results through widespread implementation.

The evidence base on HIV and key populations has grown tremendously in the past several years, and more will come to the fore at the IAS conference. We will be participating with an eye toward how we can move the science into practice so that it benefits as many people as possible, as quickly as possible. The science holds much promise; we cannot let implementation lag.

Through Bullets and Bombs to Reach Health Care

Written by Cecilia Amaral, Global Health Corps Fellow, IntraHealth International, and Carol Bales, Senior Communications & Advocacy Officer, IntraHealth International

This blog post was originally featured on IntraHealth International’s VITAL blog.


 

111

Photos: Alex Collins, Senior Program Officer, IntraHealth International

In conflict areas around the world, health workers like Patrick in South Sudan continue to risk their lives to do their jobs.

“There were guns, bullets, and bombs everywhere,” says Patrick Hakim, a clinical officer in South Sudan.

That was the scene around Juba last July after fighting broke out at the presidential compound between the Sudan People’s Liberation Army (SPLA) and the SPLA in Opposition (SPLA-IO) forces.

Amidst the country’s already horrific and brutal conflict, Patrick says those two weeks were characterized by widespread terror. Many borders, roads, and markets were closed. Patrick and his fellow health workers were afraid of leaving home, of being attacked or stopped at armed check points.

But he did. He went to work.

“I felt compelled to risk my life, get out of my house, and walk to Juba Teaching Hospital,” he says. “Because there were clients I had booked the previous week.”

Patrick is part of an IntraHealth International team supporting USAID’s LINKAGES project, which provides HIV testing, care, and treatment largely to foreign female sex workers—a key population in South Sudan’s fight against HIV. The team distributes condoms and antiretroviral drugs, which require regular follow-up and refilling of prescriptions.

So during the days of the July crisis, Patrick was still receiving calls for HIV services.

Patrick Hakim, LINKAGES Clinical Officer

Patrick Hakim, LINKAGES Clinical Officer

He and his colleagues continued offering some HIV services to their clients and other South Sudanese. The team provided condoms to the female sex workers in Juba town through their peer leaders. And condoms, test kits, and antiretrovirals were made available at the Juba Teaching Hospital and Al-Saba Children’s Hospital, the other main hospital in Juba town.

But many of Patrick’s clients weren’t calling. They were scared, too. Many fled Juba and even South Sudan. Some hid in the bush. And some ran out of food and stopped taking their antiretroviral medications to avoid the side effects.

One client, a sex worker who travelled from Yei to Juba to refill her prescriptions every couple months, was determined to get her medication. She walked through bushes and villages to avoid the roads. The trip that usually took her four hours by bus took her almost four weeks. When she finally reached Juba Teaching Hospital, Patrick says, she had lost a lot of weight, was malnourished, and had a persistent cough. In fact, she could hardly breathe.

But she made it. Patrick can only guess how many others did not.

Disease Doesn’t Wait for War to End

Since civil war broke out in South Sudan in December 2013, tens of thousands of people have been killed and three million people have been displaced. The country has plunged into a humanitarian crisis that has been exacerbated by famine in the northern-central region. The crisis worsened in 2016, and 7.5 million people are in need of humanitarian assistance.

Now millions of people are vulnerable to disease and injury and unable to reach the health care they need. More are dying from vaccine-preventable and treatable diseases, such as measles and cholera—deaths that are directly linked to the lack of basic health services. Women lack skilled birth assistance and access to contraception, and people with HIV/AIDS or tuberculosis have been cut off from life-saving medications.

Only 43% of South Sudan’s health facilities are now functional. More than 100 have closed, and at least 29 have been looted or destroyed since the beginning of the civil war.

In February 2016, a Médecins Sans Frontières medical center in Jonglei state was caught in crossfire. A six-year-old boy was shot and died. Thirty-five other patients were injured. The center was looted of medical equipment and medicines.

In the days of the July crisis, when Patrick’s client was avoiding roads and hiding in the bush, shelling hit the maternity wing of an International Medical Corps hospital within a UN Protection of Civilians site in Juba. Fifty thousand people were suddenly without medical services and humanitarian aid.

Patrick had reason to be scared. Health workers, patients, and facilities are deliberate targets.

drop

The waiting room of the LINKAGES drop-in center.

Last May, for example, soldiers at a checkpoint in Yei shot a doctor in the stomach while she was driving an ambulance late at night, returning from rushing a pregnant woman for emergency care. She died four days later from her injuries. In September, armed men threatened health officials at gunpoint while ransacking a health center in Lasu. In December, also in Lasu, SPLA-IO forces abducted three health workers during road clashes (they were later released).

And that’s not all. What’s happening in South Sudan exemplifies a continuing trend among conflict-ridden countries.

Impunity Must End

A new report by the Safeguarding Health in Conflict Coalition, Impunity Must End, documents attacks on health care in 23 countries in conflict around the world.

  • In Syria, there were 108 attacks on health facilities and 91 health workers killed.
  • In Afghanistan, there were 119 attacks on health facilities and health workers.
  • In West Bank/Gaza, 162 medical technicians were injured by violence or interference with ambulances.

But documentation of such attacks remains spotty. The report’s numbers may greatly understate the actual extent and severity of these attacks.

And accountability remains almost non-existent. Despite the adoption of UN Security Council Resolution 2286 last year, which set out a roadmap to protect health in conflict, practically nothing has been done to enforce and implement it.

Impunity Must End makes concrete recommendations to end these atrocities, including regular reporting by countries to the UN on how they are preventing attacks, investigating those that occur, and holding perpetrators accountable. If member states fail to act, the UN Security Council—which met last week to discuss the resolution again—should initiate thorough investigations and establish accountability procedures. The UN Security Council must act.

It was Patrick’s childhood dream to become a health worker so that others wouldn’t suffer the hardships his family endured due to lack of access to health care. But he and his colleagues need to be safe to save lives. They should not have to be scared to go to work. And no one should have to be scared to seek out health care.

The impunity must end.

Read more about Patrick in this Picture It post.

IntraHealth is a founding member of the Safeguarding Health in Conflict Coalition. IntraHealth leads communications for the coalition and co-authored and edited the new Impunity Must End report. This blog post sites data from the report.

DSC_0016 - Copy.JPG

The ART center at the Juba Teaching Hospital, where LINKAGES clinical staff like Patrick provide HIV services on a weekly basis as support to the existing hospital staff.

Early Lessons from South Africa’s Rollout of Oral PrEP to Sex Workers

This blog has been reposted from Prepwatch.org; the original posting can be found here. Contributed by Neeraja Bhavaraju and Daniela Uribe from FSG, a member of the OPTIONS Consortium.

In June 2016, South Africa’s National Department of Health began making oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) available to sex workers. This represented the first time that any PrEP product was made available outside of a research study or demonstration project in an African country. In the first six months, hundreds of women have started taking PrEP from a network of 11 sites across five provinces in South Africa.

Maria Sibanyoni, program manager of the sex worker program at Wits RHI, a research institute focusing on sexual and reproductive health, HIV and vaccine preventable diseases, shared some early insights on what she has learned about delivering PrEP. These are some of the first “real world” insights that we have about PrEP delivery, and they will be invaluable to the wider rollout of PrEP in South Africa and beyond.

Lesson #1: Meeting people where they are increases access and uptake

A multi-channel strategy supports PrEP uptake

“One of the approaches that we use to provide services is through fixed facilities. Sex workers are able to access these facilities anytime. The second approach is outreach. We go out with a package of services—medicines, equipment, and HIV test kits—and reach out to the sex workers in brothels. When we get to the brothels we request a room and set up a clinic to provide services in the brothel itself. The third approach is a mobile van. We are targeting those who are street-based, whether they are operating at the bush, on the highway, under the bridge, wherever, to reach those sex workers using a mobile van where we provide a comprehensive package of services. The fourth approach is using the peer educators, who form a link between the clinic and the sex workers because they do lots of referrals, they go out there, they mobilize, they also provide HIV testing services including finger pricking, give health talks, they talk about PrEP quite a lot, but also they make sure that they link the sex workers to our services so that they are able to access PrEP.”

Lesson #2: Those with high HIV-risk perception more frequently use and adhere to PrEP

Raising awareness among potential PrEP users about their own risk is a strategy to generate demand for PrEP and ensure higher levels of adherence.

“With sex workers, the ones who see themselves at risk are keen to take-up PrEP. However, those who are just worried will start coming up with excuses: ‘I can’t take a pill every day.’ They are worried for now but they are willing to take the risk. Those who see themselves being at risk know PrEP will help them. People know their lifestyle and who they engage with, they know the factors that are pushing them to request it.”

Area for further study
While it is clear that some women are “self-selecting” to use PrEP, we still don’t know whether those women who are “self-selecting” are those at highest risk for HIV transmission. Further study on this issue could mitigate concerns about the “worried-well” driving PrEP demand and will help inform plans for broader PrEP introduction.

Lesson #3: Creating a community of support increases adherence

From peer educators to friends, having a community to create accountability can make all the difference.

“We have looked at different strategies of adherence. We look at a buddy system – who are they bringing or identifying as their support person or support structure that will ensure that they take treatment on time and they come in for their check-ups. We also keep a register to ensure that those who do not honor their appointment are traced, telephonically and physically. We have peer educators who do the physical tracking. They go to the brothels to find the sex workers, even though they are mobile; the peer educators have been in the area and have a relationship with the community, and they will have feedback and information about where they are.”

Lesson #4: Engaging and supporting health care workers is essential

While PrEP represents a “breakthrough,” it also represents a significant new workload.

“PrEP is new, and as with anything that is new people will react differently. Some of the health care workers see PrEP as a breakthrough. But others see PrEP as an added responsibility that will increase their workload. A clinician used to see someone who was HIV negative and say “’stay negative and we will see you in 6 months or a year’s time.’ But with PrEP now we have to initiate you, call you after a week, call you after a month, call you after three months. So some might think ‘this is actually increasing my workload.’”

5D3_4650

Photos by: Dawn Greensides, Wits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute

Key Population Hero: Addressing stigma and discrimination among LGBT people in Kenya

Written by Levis Nderitu, co-founder, Sullivan Reed

Sullivan Reed is an organization in Nairobi, Kenya that specializes in the economic and social empowerment of LGBT people in Kenya, where homosexuality is criminalized and HIV prevalence is almost three times higher among men who have sex with men than the general population.

Many lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people in Kenya are facing stigma and discrimination silently. They may not know how to access HIV services and, even if they do know, they wonder how will they be treated when they get there.

LGBT-friendly services do exist and we encourage people to use them. But not every provider is affirming. People are worried that they will be outed by medical staff, and with good reason. I’ve heard LGBT people talk of nurses calling other nurses over and “making an example” of them. I’ve heard of young LGBT people having their parents called. You can imagine how traumatizing this is.

People’s fears about accessing health care are compounded when they face other stigmatizing, even violent, situations. I saw this clearly recently when my friend’s boyfriend celebrated his birthday. He invited a few friends to his home, all of whom are LGBT. Then men, armed with sticks, broke in and started beating people. They said they did not want “people like [my friends]” in the neighborhood. Despite living there for two years without any complaints against them, my friends were evicted. It’s a tight-knit community and rumors soon spread. All those who had been there were scared; they had been exposed as LGBT and their lives were at risk.

Lots of LGBT people look at a situation like this and think “if I can’t even be happy in my own neighborhood, around people who know me, how do I then go to the hospital?” The impact of this type of intimidation is huge.

To help, we applied for funding through the International HIV/AIDS Alliance’s Rapid Response Fund, which issues emergency grants of up to $20,000 in 29 countries when stigma, discrimination, and violence threaten HIV services for LGBT people and MSM. Since its inception in October, the fund and has already received more than 235 applications.

The money came through quickly. We relocated all those in fear to a safe house and linked many of them to LGBT-friendly health services. Through the fund you can also apply for support for initiatives that will have a longer-term impact. I’m developing a mobile app to enable people to find LGBT-friendly services near them, and again I have turned to the Rapid Response Fund for help.

Many Kenyans are hostile to LGBT people, mainly because of the legal framework. But among younger people and in more cosmopolitan communities, attitudes have been improving. We have a new crop of people who believe in diversity and inclusion. I believe more and more straight people will begin to champion LGBT rights here and bring this community out of the margins.

We need to look at the issue of economic empowerment as many LGBT people struggle to find work. Some turn to sex work, which increases their vulnerability to HIV. We must enable people to support themselves; it’s a critical component of change.

As long as the existing penal code is in place, the fight will be tough. But when I look around me I see a lot of hope. Things are changing. Everyone should be able to live a full life, regardless of who they are and whom they love. We are working to make that happen.


To learn more about the Alliance’s Rapid Response Fund visit rapidresponsefund.org

 

 

Reducing Gender-Based Violence Against Women Who use Drugs: The Right to be Free

Written by Judy Chang, Board Member, International Network of People who use Drugs

Globally, it is estimated that one out of three women experiences gender-based violence (GBV) in her lifetime. Data on women who use drugs and their experiences of violence are scarce; this is not surprising given our status as an invisible population. As a result of criminalization, discrimination, and stigmatization, women who use drugs are disproportionately affected by violence. Women who use drugs commonly experience violence at the hands of state actors, notably the police, and when violence comes from intimate partners and the wider community, it is often perpetrated with impunity.

tanpud

Tanzanian Network of People who use Drugs. Photo by Ruth Birgin.

GBV against women who use drugs manifests as a result of a range of interrelated structural, systemic, and sociocultural drivers. Our experiences of GBV are both driven and compounded by stigma and discrimination and inequality. In 2015, the International Network of Women Who Use Drugs (INWUD), along with Women and Harm Reduction International Network, released a statement for the International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women. The statement included a number of testimonials from women who use drugs and have been affected by violence. One woman shared her story.

“The insidious creep of abuse of domestic violence makes it hard to speak out. But when police fail to act on a charge, it becomes a double act of injustice. The neighbours called the police to my house, after I had just gone through a window. Under questioning he [my partner] told the police officer I was a drug user. Tearful and shaken, I found the tables turned on me. Rather than pursue a clear case of domestic violence, he chose to search me for drugs. It only took those two little words of ‘drug user’ for the police officer to see me not as a victim of domestic violence, but as a woman not deserving of equal protection under the law. At a time when I felt the most broken, I had to bear the force of a broken system which treats women who use drugs as undeserving of the same rights as other women.” (INWUD Virtual Consultation, 2015)

Our current value system that embraces prohibition places an inordinate amount of focus and effort on regulating and controlling what a woman puts into her body, rather than what is being inflicted on her body, more often than not by those with more power. Driven by political ideology and moral attitudes, the damage that the war on drugs wages on women’s bodies needs a political solution. INPUD argues that community organizing, community mobilization, and solidarity building remain the most effective and protective barriers against abuses and violations. Historically, we have seen these used as political tools to make critical gains in labor rights, civil rights, liberties, and in the HIV movement.

Ruth Birgin, INPUD’s Women’s Policy Officer has been catalyzing women who use drugs in countries in Asia and across Africa. She has been working with women from national drug user networks and supporting them to come together, develop plans and strategies to meet their community-defined needs, and create mechanisms for collective support. In Indonesia, for instance, INPUD supports the activities of PKNI, the national drug user network, that contributes to broader goals of increasing understanding and awareness of violence against women who use drugs and developing elements of protection. In Tanzania, INPUD’s Women’s Policy Officer is coordinating with women from the Tanzanian Network of People who use Drugs (TANPUD), who will be running their own activities, including a public event on December 10. A women’s advocacy team comprised of TANPUD members has been formed.  They are currently developing a statement on violence against women who use drugs, which is to be presented to the Ministry of Community Development Gender and Children on the 2016 International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women.

The upcoming years are crucial. As we prepare for increasing onslaughts on the rights of women worldwide—including sexual and reproductive health rights, the right to bodily integrity and self-determination, and the right to be free from violence and sexual assault—women who use drugs need to come together to organize and strengthen our networks and communities. This is the first, crucial step to challenging damaging political realities. Now more than ever, the status quo will no longer suffice.


Judy Chang (MIntDev) is a board member of INPUD; a consultant with Coact, which is a technical support agency specializing in HIV and drug use; and an MPhil Candidate at the National Drug Research Institute (NDRI) in Australia.

INPUD is a global peer-based organization that seeks to promote the health and defend the rights of people who use drugs. INPUD challenges stigma, discrimination, and criminalization of people who use drugs and the impact they have on the drug-using community’s health and rights. The International Network of Women Who Use Drugs is a subnetwork comprised of those who self-identify as women and who use drugs.

Comprehensive violence-response services in the Dominican Republic: A spotlight on CEPROSH

LINKAGES would like to thank the clinical staff members of CEPROSH, the police chief, and the key population members in Puerto Plata who contributed to this interview.

LINKAGES has the privilege of working with many incredible community-based organizations throughout the world that offer violence-response services to key populations. Below is an interview with The Centro de Promoción y Solidaridad Humana (CEPROSH), an HIV/AIDS awareness and prevention organization based in the northern region of the Dominican Republic. CEPROSH works to improve regional capacity to deliver quality services related to HIV and gender-based violence to key populations

1. How are key populations affected by gender-based violence in Puerto Plata? What types of violence do they most experience?

Intimate partner violence, hate crimes, and stigma and discrimination are significant issues faced by transgender people and sex workers in the Dominican Republic (DR). Transgender people also face difficulty in securing employment and are often rejected because of their gender identity or sexual orientation. Transgender people who engage in sex work also experience violence at the hands of the police. Police will often handcuff them, spit on them, and pull their hair.

Stigma and discrimination against key populations are prevalent in the DR. A patient at CEPROSH relayed her experience with transphobia, which she said humiliated her and left her in a great deal of pain:

“I got in a taxi and when the driver realized that I was trans, he stopped the car, got out, opened my door, and said, ‘Get out my car you *expletive*! I don’t allow *expletive* in my car!’ In that moment, I wanted nothing more than the ground to open up and swallow me. Everyone was looking at me, and only one onlooker showed any kind of indignation at the taxi driver. I will never forget that kind of humiliation for as long as I live.”

2. What are some of the links between violence and HIV for key populations in the Dominican Republic?

The links between violence and HIV that we see through our work at CEPROSH stem mainly from:

  • Social and family exclusion
  • Lack of knowledge among key populations about their health and human rights
  • Lack of will to seek health services
  • Poor mental health
  • Stigma and discrimination

3. What kind of services does CEPROSH offer to support key populations who have experienced violence?

We work with peer outreach workers and counselors at the clinic, and counsel key populations on their rights in an effort to empower them. We also have agreements with their supervisors at their jobs (for those who are able to work), which permit key populations to leave work in order to make their appointments at the clinic. For those who are not able to visit the clinic, we offer community-based HIV testing. Additionally, we take a comprehensive approach toward offering health services to key populations by offering the following:

ceprosh-photo

CEPROSH Peer Educators

  • Crises response services
  • Clinical services
  • Psychosocial support
  • Rapid HIV testing
  • Post-exposure prophylaxis
  • STI testing and treatment
  • Emergency contraceptive
  • Mental health services
  • Legal services
  • Support groups

 

 

 

 

 

 

4. What is something you learned during your time working with key populations who have experienced violence?

We learned that it is very difficult for someone to leave the circle of violence that entraps them. We have seen how violence can rob you of your identity, your profession, your family and friends, and your willpower. We also learned that through counselling and violence-response services, you can return a sense of confidence, strength, and self-worth to victims so that they can move forward.

5. What is a lesson that you’d like to share with other organizations that offer services to key populations who have experienced violence?

In order to help key populations who have experienced violence, you need to train organizational staff and health workers on key population service delivery. This includes helping staff to confront and address any negative biases they may have toward key populations, to dismantle any myths or negative stereotypes about key populations, and to deliver correct health information in a stigma-free environment.

6. How does CEPROSH work with other members of the community (police, doctors, religious leaders) to address gender-based violence toward key populations?

We sensitize community stakeholders through informal meetings and workshops with key populations to help them to understand the ways in which systemic violence is a violation of human rights for all people. We explain that often this violence comes from a fear of the unknown, or from people operating with misinformation about key populations. We work to reverse those preconceived notions and prejudices about key populations. We also form alliances among various community services that could work to protect the health and human rights of those most vulnerable.

7. How have the attitudes of CEPROSH staff and the community members mentioned above changed as a result of the LINKAGES project?

There have been many positive changes, but there is still work to do. Many of us recognize that before receiving gender sensitivity training from the LINKAGES project, we treated key populations with disrespect. Some of us growing up were even taught to hate them because they were different. Since the trainings, we have recognized the need to not treat key populations differently, but rather, treat them with the kindness, respect, and dignity they deserve.